Case Prep

Market entry, actually explained

Should we enter this market, country, or segment, and if so, how? Half the marks are in the "how," which most candidates skip straight past.

Structure it as

Three questions, in order. Skipping ahead to "how" before answering the first two is the most common mistake here.

1

Market attractiveness

Size, growth rate, typical margins, competitive intensity. Is this a market worth being in at all, regardless of who's asking?

2

Our right to win

Do we actually have the capabilities, brand, distribution, or cost position to succeed here, or would we be a weak new entrant regardless of how attractive the market is?

3

Mode of entry

Build (organic, slow, full control), buy (acquire a local player, fast but expensive with integration risk), or partner (JV/licensing, fast and lower risk but shared upside).

4

Rough financial case

Approximate cost to enter vs. expected payback period, a sense check on whether it's worth it before you recommend how.

Worked example: budget gym chain entering France

A UK budget gym operator is considering expansion into France.

Market attractiveness

  • Growing fitness market
  • But established budget operators already present

Right to win

  • Strong low-cost operating model
  • Zero brand recognition or French real estate relationships

Recommendation: enter via acquiring a small existing regional player rather than building from scratch. It buys the local relationships and brand presence the chain doesn't have, in a market that's attractive but not empty.

Watch for

Stopping at "yes, we should enter" without addressing how. And skipping the right-to-win question entirely: a great market doesn't automatically mean a great fit for this specific client.

Other case types

Worth knowing all four before you walk in, you won't always get to pick which one shows up.