Application Process

The application process, stage by stage

Every firm dresses this up slightly differently, but the shape is almost always the same five stages. Here's what each one actually involves, using my own OC&C process as the concrete example.

1

CV Submission

One to two pages. This gets screened by a real person against what the firm is actually looking for: not just keywords, but evidence of grit and standout experience. More on what "standout" means below.

2

Video Interview

Usually pre-recorded, a handful of questions (mine was 3, via Willo), answered straight to camera with no interviewer on the other end. Treat it like a real interview. It's a genuine filter, not a formality.

3

Online Test

A timed, GMAT-style test: quant and verbal reasoning, usually adaptive, so it gets harder as you go. No calculator. Practising mental maths and data-sufficiency style questions beforehand pays off directly here.

4

First Round

Typically two 30-minute interviews, with a Consultant and a Manager. Approachable in tone: basic cases, easy maths, some graph reading. This is testing whether you can hold a structure, not whether you know a niche framework.

5

Final Round

Two 45-minute interviews with Partners. Cases tend to sit in broader, less familiar industries, less "learnable," more about using judgement live. Still practicable with the right prep, just a different muscle to the first round.

What actually matters more than your CV

Uni prestige does get weighted heavily. That's just real, and pretending otherwise doesn't help anyone prep properly. But inside that pool, the degree itself matters far less than people assume.

What doesn't separate people

  • Studying economics or business specifically
  • A "consulting-relevant" degree in general
  • Generic extracurriculars everyone lists

What actually does

  • How you present under pressure
  • Real project experience you can speak to in detail
  • Genuine markets and current-events knowledge, not memorised talking points

My cohort of 22 at OC&C was almost entirely target university: Warwick, Oxbridge, UCL, Imperial, LSE. What separated people inside that pool wasn't the degree, it was whether they could talk credibly about a real project and about what's actually happening in the world.

Two case formats you'll run into

Firms don't all run cases the same way. Knowing which one you're walking into changes how you should behave in the room.

Interviewer-led

The interviewer drives the structure, feeding you one sub-question at a time rather than letting you run the whole thing yourself.

  • You respond to each prompt as it comes, rather than laying out the full path upfront
  • Less room to go off-track, but also less room to show independent structuring
  • Common at firms like Bain and BCG

Interviewee-led (candidate-led)

You build and drive the entire structure yourself. The interviewer mostly stays quiet and lets you steer.

  • You propose the framework, decide what to dig into, and pace the case yourself
  • More room to impress, but also more room to wander if your structure is weak
  • Common at firms like McKinsey and OC&C